[CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations

Paul J. Piercey p.piercey at nl.rogers.com
Mon Mar 17 22:02:53 EDT 2008


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> Jimk8mr at aol.com
> Sent: March 17, 2008 22:22
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com; kenharker at kenharker.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations
> 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 3/17/2008 5:33:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight 
> Time, kenharker at kenharker.com writes:
> 
> The potential of using multiple remote locations is a valid  
> concern and one that contest sponsors need to make sure is 
> prohibited and  communicated to the contest community through 
> rules clarifications,  changes, or FAQs.
>  
> =============================
>  
> What is the problem with using multiple remote locations?  
> Why is  this any different from what I do in CW SS, operating 
> from several different  physical stations during the course 
> of the contest?
>  
> So long as there is no attempt to selectively work or not 
> work any other particular station - the "captive rover" issue 
> of the VHF world - who  cares?
>  
> It would be a real hoot to work 24 hours from CT3 and then 
> connect up for the next 24 from 9M6. Bring it on!  
>  
>  
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR

Do you operate the same call from multiple stations during a contest or do
you use varying callsigns at these different locations?

73 -- Paul VO1HE



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list