[CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

[Igor Sokolov]

>> 1)Why ENN in cw contest is legal and silent omission  of the default 59
> in
>> SSB contest is not?
>
> The rules call for a signal report.  "ENN" is a valid signal report.
> "Silence" is not a signal report.

Hans, it is all conditional. If we all silently agree to consider silence as 
default 59 signal report then silence IS a signal report.

>> 2)If 59 found in the log of the sender as well as in the log of the
>> recipient at the time of cross checking what is the ground for blaming
> the
>> sender in rules violation?
>
> If the sender didn't send a report and the recipient didn't receive a
> report, but the logs show a report was exchanged then both logs are
> falsified and ought be DQ'd.

I will wait and see how many logs of  the WPX participants are going to be 
DQed just because you said they have to be DQed :)


73, Igor UA9CDC

> 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7
> "Just a boy and his radios"
>
>
>