[CQ-Contest] Repeating an idea from the 7QP soapbox...

[Mike Coslo]

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 22:03 -0700, Kevin Rowett wrote:

> Regional parties is perhaps a better overall solution to this problem.
> We've seen the growth of 7QP, NEQP, and perhaps the original W6 CQP
> could be considered regional.

And yet the MAQP folded after 2 years.

> Some parties support the use of a serial number, some don't.  Would we require
> everyone to go to the exact same format?

how are we going to require State QSO parties to do anything, Kevin?
Massive boycott or something? not participate because a party requires a
checkable exchange instead of 599 for all exchanges?

It's all voluntary. I have some people who refuse to participate in
PAQSO because we require a mailed summary sheet. That is their right.

I like the differences.

	- 73 de Mike N3LI -