[CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange

[Dale Putnam]

Proof, beyond any doubt, Tom, that there is no satisfying everyone.
There are going to be folks that are unhappy... with something.. or an 
axe to grind.. or simply unhappy... guess the answer is to keep on logging Qs. --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:33:35 -0800> From: w7why at verizon.net> To: cq-contest at contesting.com> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange> > Hi Paul> > After the CQWW, we hear. "Why send 59903?. Send something useful."> > After the SS we hear, "Why send stuff? Makes no sense."> > 73> > Tom W7WHY> > > > >I agree.> >> > Why is this such a huge issue. It says in the rules that the call must be> > given in the exchange so why can't this just be accepted? It's simply > > worded> > and very concise.. the way rules should be.> >> > Much ado about nothing.> >> > 73 -- Paul VO1HE> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----> >> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> >> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Milt, N5IA> >> Sent: November 17, 2008 22:08> >> To: George Fremin III; David Levine> >> Cc: mjc5 at psu.edu; cq-contest at contesting.com> >> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange> >>> >> Personally I like having the callsign in the exchange. It> >> allows the number and precendence to be entered and the tab> >> key hit to advance to the check box while the call is being> >> sent. AND, it does confirm the callsign.> >>> >> Mis dos centavos de Milt, N5IA> >>> >>> >> ----- Original Message -----> >> From: "George Fremin III" <geoiii at kkn.net>> >> To: "David Levine" <david at levinecentral.com>> >> Cc: <mjc5 at psu.edu>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>> >> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 1:41 PM> >> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange> >>> >>> >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:26:21PM -0500, David Levine wrote:> >> >> >> >> As for repeating the call in the report, it does seem> >> unnecessary. I read> >> >> other emails in this thread and it seems to be just based> >> on tradition.> >> >> >> > It is based on the rules.> >> >> >> > I like the long SS exchange and the callsign as part of it but> >> > maybe that is just because I am used to it after all these years.> >> >> >> > I had quite a few folks not sending their calls in the exchange.> >> > I am not sure why - it is not like it really slows you down much.> >> > 200 hours are still possible in SS phone even with the long> >> > exchange.> >> >> >> >> >> > -- > >> > George Fremin III - K5TR> >> > geoiii at kkn.net> >> > http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________> >> > CQ-Contest mailing list> >> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com> >> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------> >> ------------------> >>> >>> >>> >> No virus found in this incoming message.> >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com> >> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.4/1794 - Release> >> Date: 11/17/2008> >> 8:48 AM> >>> >> _______________________________________________> >> CQ-Contest mailing list> >> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest> >>> >> > _______________________________________________> > CQ-Contest mailing list> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest> > > > _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_________________________________________________________________
Access your email online and on the go with Windows Live Hotmail.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_access_112008