[CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest

[w1md at cfl.rr.com]

Sleep?? :)

W1MD

---- David Robbins K1TTT <k1ttt at arrl.net> wrote: 
> I'll agree with that, whats the purpose of limiting multi-op??  whats the
> daytime operator supposed to do now??
> 
> 
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> > bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Kopacz
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 04:24
> > To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> > Cc: Topband at contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest
> > 
> > "5. A 40-hour maximum operating period has been added for multi-op
> > entries."
> > 
> > Andy,
> > 
> > I am not certain I understand this rule at all. I have never operated a
> > 160 contest, but it seems to me one would be lucky to get 40 hours of
> > time on that band.
> > 
> > Besides, even if the band was open for 40 hours, why would there be a
> > maximum operating time for multi-ops? It seems that multiple operators
> > would want to operate the entire contest so everyone maximizes their on
> > air time and fun. Otherwise, why bother operating multi-op at all?
> > 
> > What am I missing here?
> > 
> > David ~ KY1V
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest