[CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN

[Richard F DiDonna NN3W]

Remember, this is not a petition to the FCC.  This seems like an open ended 
petition directed at contest sponsors (e.g., the ARRL and CQ).

Mind you, that the petition would eventually like to influence national 
level clubs - i.e., DARC, RSGB, RAC, ARRL, etc.

There is where the real problem is - as was aptly demonstrated this past 
summer involving the WAE contests..

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw at verizon.net>
To: "'David Kopacz'" <david.kopacz at aspwebhosting.com>; 
<cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN


> Here's the funny thing.
>
> Let's suppose the FCC gives the MMSN guys what they want.
>
> What's to stop contesters outside of FCC jurisdiction from operating just 
> as
> they do now, including operating near or on the MMSN frequency?  Nothing.
>
> On that basis alone, the FCC should reject the petition as unrealistic.
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest