[CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
hank.k8dd
hank.k8dd at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 19:41:05 PST 2009
humor
Of course it is time for an evaluation of the scoring rules. Doesn't
this happen
the week or two after most every contest?
We just HAVE to level the playing field by changing the rules.
/humor
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:32 PM, David Kopacz
<david.kopacz at aspwebhosting.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with this picture?
>
> EF8M(RD3AF) 7374 131 409 48 11,888,100
> V47NT(N2NT) 7402 135 457 48 11,231,424
>
> Let's see, V47NT has more Q's more zones and significantly more
> countries, but a lower score!
>
> So basically, he out-performed EF8M in all aspects and still loses.
>
> I think it's time for an evaluation of the scoring rules.
>
> What do you think?
>
> David ~ KY1V
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
"I knew that God put me on this earth to be on the radio." Ed Bradley
"Me too!" K8DD
-
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list