[CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?

[4O3A]

Hi David,

Now it hurts? What do you say if look at SSB scores, multiply each QSO 3pts, 
equally for all and take a look. 4O3A should be WW winner, and scores weight 
looks much more reasonable.

Why not..Make each continent more competitive..

73

Ranko
________________


Non-USA SOAB HP
HC8A(N6KT)        8036   166   519    47 16,012,560 NCCC ( 16M513 )
CN2R(W7EJ)        6255   167   608    45 14,370,050  ( 14M542 )
8P5A(W2SC)        8037   147   501  47.5 12,667,752 NCCC ( 15M623 )
CR2X(OH2UA)       8179   143   523    48 11,067,588 CCF ( 16M057 )
4O3A(ES5TV)       7680   165   581    48 10,682,720 SKY CC ( 17M187 )
KH7XS(K4XS)       6156   142   318    45  8,302,900 FCG ( 8M495 )


Subject: [Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?


> What's wrong with this picture?
>
> EF8M(RD3AF)       7374   131   409    48 11,888,100
> V47NT(N2NT)       7402   135   457    48 11,231,424
>
> Let's see, V47NT has more Q's more zones and significantly more
> countries, but a lower score!
>
> So basically, he out-performed EF8M in all aspects and still loses.
>
> I think it's time for an evaluation of the scoring rules.
>
> What do you think?
>
> David ~ KY1V