[CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests
Kerr, Prof. K.M.
k.kerr at abdn.ac.uk
Mon Feb 16 07:02:30 EST 2009
To be fair to K5D, my impression was that, this weekend, they did a lot less 40m CW than they might otherwise have done. I presumed this was a recognition by them of the potential problem you describe.
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Henk Remijn PA5KT
Sent: 16 February 2009 07:57
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests
This weekend I listened a while to the EU mess around K5D.
Specially on 40m there was a lot of confusion because K5D listened down on CW, resulting in a lot of frustations to innocent PACC participants who got a large pileup landing on them.
Still remember last years operation of VP6DX which made the small SSB part of 160 useless during the cq160.
I really hope K5D will stay away from cw during the ARRL DX coming weekend, having a large split frequency operation will cause a lot of troubles during a major contest like the arrl dx. It will also make large portions of the band unusable, which is a problem on 160 and 40.
Henk Remijn PA5KT
email: pa5kt at remijn.net
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.
More information about the CQ-Contest