[CQ-Contest] [Re: CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs]

[David Pruett]

What if you make a spectacle of it, and the rest of us still don't care?

ve4xt at mts.net wrote:
> What if you held a protest and nobody knew?
>
> For any protest to have effect, there must be public knowledge of it or it gets swept under the rug.
>
> The whole point of a protest is to make a spectacle of it, otherwise, there's no point to the protest.
>
> 73, kelly
> ve4xt
>   
>> From: David Gilbert <xdavid at cis-broadband.com>
>> Date: 2009/01/30 Fri AM 09:48:45 CST
>> To: "CQ-Contest at contesting. com" <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] [Re:  CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs]
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think there's anything "wrong" with KY1V deciding not to submit 
>> his log ... for any reason.  I do, however, think it's misguided and 
>> inconsistent of him to make a public spectacle of it in order to decry 
>> the presumption of guilt as his rationale for doing so, when the log 
>> checking process itself involves far more presumption of guilt than does 
>> making logs public.
>>
>> 73,
>> Dave   AB7E
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael Coslo wrote:
>>     
>>> Why on earth would anyone even complain about David not submitting? He  
>>> doesn't like one of the rules,  acted completely within his rights as  
>>> an Amateur radio operator by operating in the contest, didn't submit  
>>> his log,  and just mentioned it here, with his reason.
>>> -73 de Mike N3LI -
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>