[CQ-Contest] IARU Rules RE: Packet

[Richard F DiDonna NN3W]

Why stop there.  How about the absurd little Multi Single rules that don't 
allow for mult hunting.

This is probably the one major contest where any single op worth his salt 
should be able to run circles around a multi single.

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT at ARRL.NET>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU Rules RE: Packet


>I wouldn't mind a m/m category for other than hq stations either, but 
>that's
> not in the rules for this year.
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hal Kennedy [mailto:halken at comcast.net]
>> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 15:09
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] IARU Rules RE: Packet
>>
>> Suppose as a Single Op, CW, I would like to use packet in the upcoming
>> IARU test.  The rules state this makes me M/S (seems okay) and
>> mixed-mode only (a rather harsh penalty since I'm not mixed-mode), and
>> as a M/S I can't changed bands more often than every 10 minutes - which
>> means I can't run SO2R.
>>
>> Is this really what we want/need?  Some reason we can have a
>> single-op-assisted category?
>>
>> Hal
>> N4GG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest