[CQ-Contest] License

[Kenneth E. Harker]

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:00:20PM -0400, Yuri VE3DZ wrote:
> Well, then how, for instance, about a bunch of Europeans answering 
> split-CQ's of the U.S. stations below 7040?
> A lot of them are not allowed to run SSB below that frequency.
> Should the CQ WW committee DQ them if someone raises complaint?
> 
> Just curious, how far should that go.

There's a big difference between someone not having a valid license and
someone not following a voluntary, regional band plan.

Besides, split-frequency QSOs on 40 are going to be much less common 
from now on - I bet this is a rare issue in the future.


> 73 Yuri  VE3DZ
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola at elisanet.fi>
> To: "'Yuri VE3DZ'" <ve3dz at rigexpert.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 4:59 PM
> Subject: VS: [CQ-Contest] License
> 
> 
> I think it just means operations must be legitimate, nothing more.
> 
> 73,
> Jukka OH6LI
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker at kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/