[CQ-Contest] CK, PR, SEC = same as cut numbers

[Alfred Frugoli]

I think education is only part of the equation. Just a few years ago,
I could barely copy the basic exchange at 30wpm. Anything out of the
rhythm, I could not copy. All I'd copy is ..--..

It's taken a fair amount of CW contest practice to be able to copy
those "out of the ordinary" requests.

73 de Al, KE1FO

On 11/11/09, Gerry Hull <gerry at yccc.org> wrote:
> I agree with you, Doug,
>
> Some of us "old farts" are probably too impatient at times.   The disconnect
> I see is a guy who sounds like he knows what he is doing (good speed, comes
> right back), yet
> is dumbfounded by abbreviations when asked for fills.
>
> Perhaps ARRL needs a sidebar on this stuff in the next SS announcement.
> Since the contest has a complex exchange, the "fill protocol"  should be
> explained!
>
> 73, Gerry W1VE
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:51 PM, <kr2q at optimum.net> wrote:
>
>> You guys crack me up.  Every year, "oh no, cut numbers."  I copy whatever
>> is sent my way.
>>
>> But far worse (IMHO) are those of you who may not "cut your numbers" but
>> cut your words.
>> I was probably 95% S+P during my short time in the SS and I can tell you
>> that I heard far
>> more repeats from guys sending CK CK CK or SEC SEC and especially PR or PX
>> or PC.
>>
>> CLEARLY, there are many "other" ops out there who have no idea what these
>> abbreviations
>> mean, yet you constantly send them.  I know what they mean and, if you're
>> reading this
>> here, you probably do too.  But LOTS of folks are clueless.  I mean
>> really,
>> how is a novice
>> SSer supposed to know what CK or PR means?
>>
>> I bet that these abbreviations (followed by no answer cuz the other guy
>> was
>> clueless) out-
>> numbered the "cut numbers" by at least 10:1 - probably more.
>>
>> I don't see how anyone who sends CK, SEC, PR can complain about the very
>> few times that
>> "cut numbers" were sent (I never heard any).
>>
>> What is "obvious" to some, is not to others.  Wish I had buck for every
>> time I heard someone
>> send PR or CK, only to have to send it again at least two more times.
>>
>> Is this the pot calling the kettle black?
>>
>> Think about it.
>>
>> de Doug KR2Q
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 73,
>
> Gerry Hull, W1VE/VE1RM
> w1ve at yccc.org
> sip: gerry at voip.w1ve.com
> aim: w1ve
> ym: w1ve
> msn: w1ve at hotmail.com
> Post and See Scores in Realtime - Try www.getscores.org
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

73 de Al, KE1FO

-----
Check out my Amateur Radio Contesting blog at ke1fo.wordpress.com.