[CQ-Contest] Multi-Single

[Mike/Shelley Ritz]

Well, at the risk of getting flamed, I think there should be MORE limits on running "multi op, single transmitter". To me, "single transmitter" means just that, ONE transmitter. In my "perfect world" one could have a second receiver to pick up mults, but that is it. At least the second station is not transmitting. Heck, you could even have three or four receivers going simultaneously, all feeding mults to the transmit station. You could even get non hams or potential hams involved with something like that. 

If you have two transmitters at one time going for any reason, I can't for the life of me understand why that is not called "multi operator, two transmitter". I just don't see the logic..... 

Let the flames begin. ;-) 

Mike, W7VO 
Scappoose, OR 




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj at orange.fr> 
To: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd at charter.net> 
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com 
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 7:22:07 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single 

Why have more limits? Who benefits from only allowing one signal at time from a multi-single? Is this going to produce more QSOs in the contest.? More importantly, why would anyone bother to enter this category when it becomes so limited. There is nothing more boring then being at a station as a mulit-single and being unable to operate. Becoming a mults-two is not really a solution. 


_______________________________________________ 
CQ-Contest mailing list 
CQ-Contest at contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest