[CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M

[brian coyne]

And just how do you do that  peter?
 
It depends what floats you boat. Personlly I have little interest in a contest which penalises you for the other uys mistake. Moreover, as a semi rare dx stn, I get a far greater number of  'Not In Log' penalties due to the higher number of 'unique, or very low count casual op, ' callers than say RA3AUU. This is wasting time that I could be spending working the RA3AUU's for valid points but it is time over which I have no control.
 
RDXC is a busy contest, has the oblast interest and certainly, due to the ajudication system gives more chance to the DL3's & G4's to gain a higher place. It cannot however be compared to any other event because the rules and marking are different and you like it or you don't.
 
73  Brian C4Z.  (5B4AIZ).
--- On Wed, 7/4/10, DF3KV <df3kv at t-online.de> wrote:


From: DF3KV <df3kv at t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M
To: "'KL7RA'" <kl7ra at ptialaska.net>, "'cq-contest'" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, 7 April, 2010, 1:34


You just have to make sure the other operator logged what you transmitted

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of KL7RA

I have no control over what is logged by the other oper. The discussion on
this rule and the RDXC rules in general isn't necessary here as the final
order of finish will be the same with or without this rule, that is;
everyone treated equally unfair, but you have to draw the line somewhere and
this is mine.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest