[CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend....

[Jimk8mr at aol.com]

If the unscrupulous person was a single op (not assisted) he would have to  
be doubly unscrupulous to have an open packet/internet connection available 
 to spot the guy.
 
If the person was assisted (single op or multi) it would be a sign of  
scrupulousness that he wanted to verify the callsign from the sending  station, 
not from third party spotting information.
 
73  -  Jim   K8MR
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/1/2010 7:23:06 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
kq2m at earthlink.net writes:

Only an  unscrupulous person would even suggest such a 
shameful thing!  I  can't believe that you actually posted this.

Two wrongs don't make a  right, no matter what the
perceived "offense".

Bob  KQ2M


An unscrupulous person (not me!)  might discourage this by 
intentionally spotting non-IDer's calls  incorrectly by a dit or 
two.  Such as BY5A instead of 6Y5A, or ER8A  instead of EF8A, etc.  :-)

Let  the non-IDers beware!

73,   Bill  W4ZV