[CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....

[Robert Chudek - K0RC]

Yesterday while at Barnes & Noble, I sat down to browse through an 
interesting book about the formation of state boundaries as the USA grew 
from east to west. There were interesting tales about the states that 
"might have been", had the chips fallen slightly different in some 
instances.

For example, we could have had Acadia, Chippewa, Franklin, and even 
Hazard on our states list, to name a few. And as long as we have 
Washington, we might of also had the states of Jefferson and Lincoln 
too. And my personal favorite, "Yazoo!"

http://www.amazon.com/Lost-States-Stories-Texlahoma-Transylvania/dp/1594744106

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN




On 12/24/2010 5:42 PM, George Fremin III wrote:
> The mults for the naqp are states.  I don't think Campbell, CA is a separate state from CA.
>
> --
> George Fremin III
>
>
> On Dec 24, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Jack Brindle<jackbrindle at me.com>  wrote:
>
>> And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" side of things for a change...
>>
>> Jack Brindle, W6FB
>>
>>
>> On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>>
>>> Good choice.  While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a
>>> multiplier?
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>