[CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....

[Barry]

Let's take it a step further - any contests that break up YU, NU, adnNWT 
into separate mutls should also include Mexcian states as mults.  Then 
next, does Belize have states? :.)
Barry W2UP

On 12/25/2010 8:36 PM, Jimk8mr at aol.com wrote:
> In contests that distinguish between Canada's Yukon, Northwest Territories,
>   and Nunavut, it makes as much or more sense to recognize the District of
> Columbia as being separate from Maryland. As scare as DC might be, it  still
> has more active hams (or at least more active hams that can be heard
> through auroral propagation) than all three of those territories combined.
>
> In contests that combine those three territories into one multiplier, it is
>   logical is to include the District of Columbia as part of Maryland.
>
> Likewise, in contests that use ARRL/RAC sections, it follows  to use the
> MDC section. (The Canadian northern territories are not  an RAC section; they
> are a special exception from their administrative  treatment of being part
> of the Alberta section).
>
> The NAQP is the first type of contest - it counts the three Canadian
> northern territories as separate multipliers.
>
>
> 73   -   Jim   K8MR
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/25/2010 10:07:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> jackbrindle at me.com writes:
>
> That is  kind of the point. Washington, DC is not a state either. Let's
> leave well  enough alone.
>
> Jack Brindle, W6FB
>
>
>>>   On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good choice.  While we're at it, how about adding  Washington, D.C. as
> a
>>>> multiplier?
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>