[CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI?
ve4xt at mts.net
Mon Feb 22 06:53:58 PST 2010
Seems to me that the 5nnjtt station either isn't set up with a paddle
or didn't realize how ineffective jtt is as a cut number.
If you keep getting asked for fills, your cut numbers aren't working.
And it likely indicates you're in for some busted Qs particularly if
some people decide to just log what was sent, no matter how
incomprehensible what was sent really was.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:28 AM, "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd at charter.net>
> Thanks Bob. Not sure I agree with your assertion of being assisted
> because a general question was asked. Seems a bit extreme and
> silly! I feel
> no guilt since I didn't read any of the responses until after the
> and my log was already submitted.
> I wrote my post after listening to one station send 5nnjtt over and
> All attempts to ask for a repeat of the number just resulted in the
> 5nnjtt. A number of other stations that called in also sent jtt or
> j00. Was
> just frustrated at the time.
> Also wanted to be first to cleverly initiate the annual cut number
> discussion. :)
> Randy, K5ZD
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> Robert L. Shohet
>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 12:38 PM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI?
>> I sure hope that those of you operating in ARRLDXCW this
>> weekend and posting or reading this post are claiming an
>> ASSISTED or MULTI-something category of operation.
>> In fact, asking what the "JTT" Exchange means DURING a
>> contest is no different than asking for help with a Callsign
>> DURING a contest.
>> I thought that this practice was not allowed? Seems a lot
>> like cheating on an exam to me.
>> Bob KQ2M
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest