[CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW?

[Rick Lindquist, WW3DE]

Just when did ham radio contesting stop being about having fun? 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng at bresnan.net> 
To: "Kelly Taylor" <theroadtrip at mts.net>, cq-contest at contesting.com 
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 12:47:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? 

Yep! Not me! Me too! Yep! 

My solution has been to redefine my participation. It's working for me. 

73, Wayne, N7NG 
Jackson Hole 



-----Original Message----- 
From: Kelly Taylor [mailto:theroadtrip at mts.net] 
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:16 PM 
To: Wayne Mills; cq-contest at contesting.com 
Cc: wayg at cape-vision.com 
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? 

And of course, that raises another question: 
If writing the rules will take a team of lawyers, then each of us will have 
to consult with our $300-per-hour legal beagles to understand them. 

Is that the kind of hobby we want? 

I didn't get in to this so lawyers would get rich. If that's where we're 
going, stop the bus and let me off. 

Most of the rules were fine when we couldn't sit here and nitpick them to 
death as armchair barristers. The key is to stop over-analyzing. 

73, kelly 
ve4xt 







_______________________________________________ 
CQ-Contest mailing list 
CQ-Contest at contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest