[CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results/Overspottinganditsimpact

[HK3CW]

Paul, So now spotting gives WRTC  points? Nope. Then why the No. 1 spotted 
team R36F dropped to place 26?   Your logic makes no sense.

Hk3CW  Rob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane at ei5di.com>
To: "CQ CONTEST" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / 
Results/Overspottinganditsimpact


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb at gmail.com>
>
>> There was no impact, Rob.  LU5DX has decided to create
>> a controversy where none exists,
>
> No impact - where the number of spots for each team
> varied from 1 to 121?  Of course there was an impact.
> Look at the results.  A single additional spot for
> ES5TV/ES2RR could have made them winners.  One fewer
> spot for RW1AC/RA1AIP could have dropped them to
> second place.
>
> Spotting is the most significant unregulated factor in
> preventing WRTC being a true measure of the operating
> skills of each team.
>
> Can it be regulated?  If not, we will have the same
> controversy next time.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest