[CQ-Contest] Speed Change Prevents Skimmer Spot

[Joe]

As long as it's below like 35 to 40 wpm,  I can always copy better than 
any program I have ever tried especially in the presence of qrm and qrn.

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 7/20/2010 6:03 PM, Larry K4AB wrote:
> So that means a human ear can copy a CQ at 35 wpm, and the callsign
>
> at 30 wpm, but the skimmer can't.
>
>
>
> Oh, thats too bad.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Larry K4AB
>
>    
>> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:09:08 -0400
>> From: n4zr at contesting.com
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Speed Change Prevents Skimmer Spot
>>
>> After consultation with VE3NEA, he confirms that any speed change
>> between the keyword (CQ, TEST etc.) and the call-sign will stop CW
>> Skimmer cold. Also, CQs in the format TEST N4ZR (only one of each) will
>> be spotted.
>>
>> For those who are interested, I will be publishing on
>> skimmertalk at contesting.com a full explanation of how Skimmer identifies
>> CQers (run stations) and validates callsigns.
>>
>> -- 
>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>>
>> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
>> The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
>> spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>      
>   		 	   		
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>