[CQ-Contest] no no no...it MUST be 579 (was 599)
mike l dol dormann
w7dra at juno.com
Fri Jul 23 09:36:34 PDT 2010
My two favorite "contests" right now are SKCC and CX. In both;
seemingly accurate RSTs transferred.
When I work a CQWW or an ARRL DX from my house in Burien, WA, 90% of all
contacts are at an RST level of 339 to 459 at the max
my last DX pidition (ZK1DRA) 90% of all stations heard were 589 to 599+,
QRN zero, QRM unbelievable
But the 5NN has a long history, in 1953 at W7AW/7, some operators used to
give out "579 WASH" to all CW contacts
mike w7dra
O> Actual RST would be great contribution to our continous research of
>
> ionospheric propagation. Contesters simply ignore that!
> Fortunately VE3NEA launched CW Skimmer and now we have great
> database of
> worldwide signal-to-noise ratios.
> As of yesterday, CW Expert robot in DOS mode is active again using
> Soundblaster instead of 1991 TI DSP board.
>
> 73 de Mario, S56A
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
____________________________________________________________
FIRE SALE: iPads for $23.74?
SPECIAL REPORT: Unique auction site can save you 90% off retail.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4c49c5608f89e9f195m03vuc
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list