[CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ????

[Braco OE1EMS]

finaly one good post....!!!!

:)

73s
Braco

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT at ARRL.NET>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ????


> You can not regulate what non-participants do in a contest.
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Edward [mailto:sawyered at earthlink.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 13:42
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ????
>>
>> Personally, I think the whole HQ thing has gotten out of hand in IARU.
>> While the DA0HQ incident is not completely related, if a change is about
>> to
>> be made to the contest concerning HQ stations, it should be changed to
>> making them M/M at one location (just like any other contest) except that
>> the M/M is carrying the HQ flag of that country's society for the contest
>> and therefore is a mult.  Then allow the HQs to remain competitive.
>>
>>
>>
>> How to solve the current problem?  Well there is already a prevailing 
>> rule
>> out there on "excessive unique" isn't there?  There should be some
>> guidelines published and there should be word put out to the local hams
>> who
>> might be inclined to do such that they need to work some other people as
>> well as their "desired" HQ station, otherwise they may inadvertently
>> disqualify the desired HQ station for "too many uniques".
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed - N1UR
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>