[CQ-Contest] Rescue efforts for HQ-category in IARU contest
Christian Schneider
prickler.schneider at t-online.de
Mon Jun 14 00:45:06 PDT 2010
Why is it that IARU itself spoke nothing official on the issue at least as
far as we Joe Verticals are able to find on the net? The competition under
the IARU-title is THE contesting showcase of the Union. Now there is a
serious debate about an essential issue of the most prestigious category
involving top teams of the national societies. The administering society
ARRL says I don´t want anymore because of behavior that is contrary to the
IARU objective of promoting international goodwill and friendship (quote
from ARRL´s statement).
What happens? On the pages of the Swiss Amateur Radio Union (USKA) one can
find a german language statement of an IARU region 1 official who recommends
to continue with HQ-preparations as there will be closed door talks two
weeks prior to the contest with association officials and HQ-teamleaders for
rules´ modifications.
Doesn´t the IARU support the position of ARRL about its own contest? Or does
IARU say: Let the HQ-teams outsource the competition into their own hands
alone kind of a professional league seperated from the other structures?
At least it will be interesting to see whether and how EA- and
DL-representatives in this new group will deal with the foreseeable
URE-protest against DA0HQ-operation in 2010 (at least URE doesn´t seem to be
calmed by the actual ARRL-reaction).
Of course, the future of a category in a contest doesn´t decide about the
future of hamming but those giving the contest its title are not expected
to be silent when a major part of it is in a crucial situation especially
when this contest were aimed at activating hams beyond the regular
contesting-community. Now there are talks how to best rescue the
topgun-competition.
Smallpistol perspective.
73, Chris
(www.dl8mbs.de)
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list