[CQ-Contest] serial numbers
Ron Notarius W3WN
wn3vaw at verizon.net
Sun Mar 14 20:49:52 PDT 2010
I should think the intention, obviously, is that you start with 1 for the
first QSO, 2 for the second, 3 for the 3rd, and so on.
Such a simple concept. And yet it appears to be somewhat controversial...
else why would there be so much arguing about it?
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:58 PM
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers
This is what the rules say:
Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact serial number
starting with 001 for the first contact
A progressive serial number. Is that the same as a sequential number, or
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, N7DF <n7df at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have noticed that there is no requirement in the WPX rules for serial
numbers to be sequential, only that they begin with 001
> Reminds me of the school kids chant "one two skip a few, forty four, skip
> Nothing against foxing out the competition by skipping ahead occasionally
to give numbers larger than them.
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
Ryan A. Jairam,
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest