[CQ-Contest] serial numbers
Ron Notarius W3WN
wn3vaw at verizon.net
Sun Mar 14 21:38:19 PDT 2010
Thank you, but when I invite K3AIR over, I'd like him to help operate the
radio, not bill me to explain the nuances of the rules to me.
Maybe it's just me being old and cranky, but I have to wonder...
Is it so hard to expect "common" sense to be applied? Or do we too many
jokers who like to play as pseudo-lawyers and look for every minute crack
that can be turned into a loophole to exploit?
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Prasad
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:01 AM
To: CQ Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers
2, 44, 144, 1044, this sequence does look like progress is being made.
Time to call out the lawyers :)
73 de Prasad VU2PTT, W2PTT
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Ryan Jairam <rjairam at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what the rules say:
> Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact serial number
> starting with 001 for the first contact
> A progressive serial number. Is that the same as a sequential number, or
> Ryan, N2RJ
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, N7DF <n7df at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I have noticed that there is no requirement in the WPX rules for serial
> numbers to be sequential, only that they begin with 001
> > Reminds me of the school kids chant "one two skip a few, forty four,
> some more"
> > Nothing against foxing out the competition by skipping ahead
> to give numbers larger than them.
> > N7DF
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> Ryan A. Jairam,
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest