[CQ-Contest] LotW after ARRL DX

[Julius Fazekas]

You're doing better than I Art... 39%

But think that may be due to fewer DX stations participating. Some states are tougher than others on LoTW. I suspect few have any problem with Tennessee any 160-6M mode ;o)

73,
Julius

PS: Anyone needing hard cards and attending Dayton, I'll have cards and logs with me.
 
Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en

Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2     #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #1875


--- On Fri, 5/7/10, Art RX9TX <rx99tx at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Art RX9TX <rx99tx at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW after ARRL DX
> To: "Helmut Mueller" <helmut at photo42.de>
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Date: Friday, May 7, 2010, 7:28 AM
>  Hello Helmut,
> 
>  My ARRL DX CW (~170 QSO only) LoTW confirmation rate is
> about 52%.
> 
>  RX9TX
> 
>  Helmut Mueller wrote:
> 
> HM> I was working ARRL DX in both modes this year and
> thought I could do
> HM> something for my WAS status. 
> 
> HM> I had full house on a few bands in both modes and
> more than 6000 Q's
> HM> combined - it was real fun.
> 
> HM> Now looking into LotW there is really nothing
> happening!  Are US hams not
> HM> using LotW at all? 
> 
> HM> On the DXCC status - it seems to be all right . but
> I have the feeling that
> HM> less than 5% are using it in the US?
> 
> HM> Helmut
> HM>  <http://www.df7zs.de> www.df7zs.de 
> 
> -- 
>  RX9TX 
>  http://rx9tx.qrz.ru
> 
>  "I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist
> it."    [Mae West]     
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>