[CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update

[K1TTT]

Quote the rule.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w5ov at w5ov.com [mailto:w5ov at w5ov.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 21:47
> To: sawyered at earthlink.net
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
> 
> It has to do with you installing something outside of your own property
> solely for your own use. This sort of thing is expressly forbidden in the
> rules.
> 
> "Public" systems like this that anyone can connect to are all permitted as
> "assistance".
> 
> Private vs. public.
> 
> Do they provide the same info? Perhaps. But that's not the point.
> 
> de W5OV
> 
> 
> 
> > It doesn't really matter to me since I never use them.contest or no
> > contest,
> > but what exactly is the difference between a personal skimmer located in
> > Europe (for a W/VE contester) and a European Skimmer that displays all
> its
> > info on the net.  Aren't they both remote CW receivers that are showing
> > callsigns and frequencies that can be read by the W/VE station?  The CQ
> WW
> > rules make it seem like one is way more advantageous than the other but
> I
> > am
> > failing to see why.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ed  N1UR
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest