[CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ

[Bob Naumann]

Just to clear the "air" a bit on this, there are many logs that have no qsos
removed and the claimed scores remain unchanged.

A quick look shows:
		Claimed and 
Call		Final Q
N6ML		518
DP4M		505
LY3CY		495
GW4BLE	474
K1TR		423
F6EWX		397
OK2ILD		394
G4WGE	385
VE2AWR	371
VA3DX		356
K9MMS	350

It seems that this is not so rare at all.

73,

Bob W5OV



-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mats Strandberg
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:59 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ

Amazing "performance" by the guys checking the logs of the QRP-section of
the contest I would say.

I have seen many dubious results in QRP during the years, but the CQWW 2010
results must compete in a very unique category.

Anything else than publishing of the two UBN-logs would be a big
dissapointment.

Please observe that I do not take any side in this debate. The winner could
definitely be the legitimate winner, BUT noone, and I mean noone, can manage
to keep the claimed scores unchanged...

If the CQWW CC lacks interest, skills or guts to fairly judge the
QRP-section, then better remove this category at all!

The efforts made by QRP-contesters are by no means less impressive than HP-
and LP-entries. These guys need the same kind of attention and detailed
checking as anyone else. A lot of things is going in behind the curtains in
QRP-contesting - therefore careful and EQUAL treatment of all top-scoring
stations should be compulsory.

73 and 72 / RA/SM6LRR, Mats
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest