[CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ

[David Thompson]

I like this compromise.  I tried to promote this at least for the top 
scorers in the CQ 160 Contests
by publishing claimed scores. You could then compare with the final results. 
I remember seeing the claimed scores in QST and CQ years ago and then 
comparing them to the final scores.  Not only did some change but some 
disappeared!
73 Dave K4JRB

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jpklemola at gmail.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ


In RDXC there is the claimed and final result available.

Not details what and how was lost.


Could that be a compromise?

Some years ago when I did log checking for a SAC, I made up a
comparative figure of merit as penalties per total QSO amount. It gave
some spice to the perspective because the more one operates, the more
errors should occur.


73,
Jukka OH6LI


2011/8/9  <w5ov at w5ov.com>:
>
> Why shouldn't they be public document?
>
> Seriously!
>
> 73,
>
> Bob W5OV
>
>
>> Everyone here knows my opinion about open logs (I'm opposed).
>>
>> Now you want to see my UBN too?
>>
>> UBN is a private tool provided by the contest sponsor which enumerates
>> where
>> I screwed up in his contest. It's a good tool which allows me to learn
>> from
>> my mistakes.
>>
>> Why should a list of my f*%*ups be a public document?
>>
>> Seriously?
>>
>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest