[CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU

[rin JG1VGX]

Paul,
This has been in place since almost two years.
Regarding the "who", there should have been a local band plan WG,
which I know little about.
Looks like we now share 7100 - 7125 and 3599 - 3600 as data seg (see
my corrected post) though the latter may not work for RTTY.

rin JG1VGX


On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah <bryonveal at msn.com> wrote:
> How long has this JA band plan been in place?  Who put it at the top of the
> "DX Alley" on 80M?  Who put it at the edge of "DX Alley" on 40M?  If we
> understood who does this stuff, maybe we can figure out away for a wiser
> band plan world wide.  But if they looked at our band plan the way it is on
> the ARRL 3/26/2007 US Amateur Radio Bands chart, , it seems like we have
> opened up RTTY and digital ourselves from the bottom of the bands upward-
> 3.520-3.530MHz? So why are we the ones to complain now after the fact- ???
> Again, I know the world has different ITU Regions that regulate certain
> amateur modes, etc.....but I can't understand how they can get it so right
> on the higher bands yet screw it up so much on 80M?
>
> 73  Paul  N0AH
>
> -----Original Message----- From: rin JG1VGX
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 9:32 PM
> Cc: CQ-Contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for RTTY RU
>
> FYI,
> Japanese band plan for RTTY (and psk, jt65 etc):
>
> 3520 - 3530
> 7025 - 7045
> 14070 - 14112
> 21070 - 21125
> 28070 - 28150
>
> Yes, we can go split on the low bands!
>
> 73 de rin JG1VGX
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
73 de rin JG1VGX