[CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences)

steve.root at culligan4water.com steve.root at culligan4water.com
Thu Jul 21 06:51:00 PDT 2011

Very true. In addition, this year we had several lines of severe thunderstorms roll through over the course of the weekend. I would have had significant down time waiting for the lightnng to go away. Add in the high absorbtion idicies and it was another weekend to get some fishing in. To bad WPX CW isn't in early April...

73 Steve K0SR

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard DiDonna NN3W [mailto:richnn3w at verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 08:45 PM
To: 'KL7RA', cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences)

Rich, I think part of the problem with WPX is not the operating rules but the weekend on which it is held. Memorial Day weekend is the unofficial start of summer, and a lot of people skip town that weekend. I have never, ever been able to compete seriously in WPX because to do so would eventually involve two attorneys and a division of assets.Move it one week back or a couple weeks forward or switch it with WPX SSB and I guarantee you'd have more people getting on....73 Rich NN3W----- Original Message ----- From: "KL7RA" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:37 PMSubject: [CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences)> >Why is the WPX-RTTY 30 hours?>> The 30 hour format seems to allow more ops outside the normal "win"> zone to make the top ten if running Europe allows a better score.>> In 2011 the top ten claimed for the WPX CW shows only one station> outside of the MA,NH,CT,NY, PA win zone and that was N2IC who> has an excellent location in NM. If the contest was 30 hours or Steve> was operating in the "win" zone with his skills I would expect his score> would have been higher.>> The top ten in the 2011 WPX RTTY with 30 hours has more outside> the zone like TN, OH, AZ, VA.>> It is what it is and I doubt there is any rule to fix the win zone > advantage> in a fair way but limiting op time to equalize propagation between east> and west seems to help level the field a little.>> Half that enter the WPX surveyed want to leave it as is which is good> enough for me, but to hear someone in Connecticut say, "increasing the> original WPX from 30 to 36 hours was a good thing", I have to ask,> "a good thing for you, sir, or those if us in the west?">> 73 Rich KL7RA (Northwest, even worse)>>>>>>> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing listCQ-Contest at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list