[CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field - my 2 cents

David J. Sourdis - HK1A hk1kxa at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 27 02:33:55 PDT 2011

Using the locators as an exchange might  be too much for some but, OTOH, would make exchange meaningful. The locator in the header as information for the contest robot is a good idea, in my opinionTo encourage the use of ALL of the low bands, more points per QSO should be assigned. 160 m with the higher value, 80 m less and so on, and not just double points for 160-80-40 and less for the rest, because this kind of division makes that contesters use 40 m, some 80 m  when 40 m gives them no more and then dismiss 160.

> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:29:56 +0000
> From: kr2q at optimum.net
> To: n5ia at zia-connection.com
> CC: k5go at cox.net; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field - my 2 cents
> Milt, N5IA agreed with Stan's (K5GO) comment below.
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Something is not quite right when a part time effort in a DX contest can make top ten 
> and knock out a full time effort by as good an> operator from a better station.> > 
> I had a private exchange with Stan and here is an excerpt.  For me, the last sentence says
> it all.
> A main problem with "points for distance" approach is there is currently nothing in place to allow for
> that.  Exchanging grid squares seems logical & everybody would quickly learn their own grid square, but
> even that is probably not precise enough.  If we went to 6 digit grids, then I think we'd have something...
> Not only would we have a point system more relevant in terms of being a DX contest, but the exchanges
> would be meaningful.  But is there a downside to that?  Maybe.  Some say that the reason the
> CQWW is so popular (with WPX right behind) is because there "isn't" an exchange and everybody
> can get on and not be challenged because of an unknown exchange.
> A possible easier solution would be to require your 6 digit maidenhead grid as part of the HEADER
> for each log entry.  Then folks would still have an "easy" exchange and could leisurely look up their
> grid post-contest.  The downside, of course, is that nobody would know their actual score until the logs
> were officially adjudicated. 
> So nothing is easy.
> de Doug KR2Q
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list