[CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange
Paul O'Kane
pokane at ei5di.com
Mon Nov 7 11:12:33 PST 2011
On 07/11/2011 16:58, Georgek5kg at aol.com wrote:
> Question: Should there be a penalty for not sending the callsign as part of
> the required exchange?
Yes, just as there should be a penalty (on ARRL) for not
including the callsign as a Cabrillo exchange element,
between the precedence and the check.
Why encourage redundancy in contest exchanges? I accept
that I may not fully understand the rich history of SS.
73,
Paul EI5DI
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list