[CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

Paul O'Kane pokane at ei5di.com
Mon Nov 7 11:12:33 PST 2011


On 07/11/2011 16:58, Georgek5kg at aol.com wrote:

> Question: Should there be a penalty for not sending the callsign as part of
>   the required exchange?

Yes, just as there should be a penalty (on ARRL) for not
including the callsign as a Cabrillo exchange element,
between the precedence and the check.

Why encourage redundancy in contest exchanges?  I accept
that I may not fully understand the rich history of SS.

73,
Paul EI5DI






More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list