[CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

[Joe]

Well then should they not change the wording of the rules? Or why bother 
having the rule at all?

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 11/9/2011 10:33 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> Joe,
>
> The ARRL and the Contest Manager in WRITING has declared that they do
> not care what two numbers you use as long as you use that the entire
> contest.  Sorry if this defeats someones database so they do not have to
> copy what was actually sent.
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
> J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>
>
> On 11/9/2011 7:53 AM, Joe wrote:
>> On 11/9/2011 3:24 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
>>> In the ARRL Contest Update for November 9, Larry K5OT,
>>> the ARRL SS manager, is quoted as saying "according to
>>> Sweepstakes rule 4.3 you must include your full call
>>> sign in the exchange".
>> And as usual That rule is broken just like the CK is constantly being
>> broken.  It is a NUMBER that is one of two possible numbers.  NOT any
>> number you choose to use.
>>
>> Joe WB9SBD
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>