[CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format
Igor Sokolov
ua9cdc at gmail.com
Wed Nov 9 11:29:08 PST 2011
IMHO the difference is in intent. One thing is to brake rules deliberately.
Another - genuine mistake.
73, Igor UA9CDC
> and the rules say the multiplier station shall only work new
> multipliers...................... What is the difference. It is ok to
> break one rule but not the other?
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
> J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>
>
> On 11/9/2011 7:06 AM, Igor Sokolov wrote:
>>> Sure, they might get a new multiplier responding to their CQ from time
>>> to
>>> time, but isn't this better than them calling CQ and saying "sorry,
>>> can't
>>> work you now, you're not a multiplier" to the rest of us?
>>>
>>> W5OV
>>
>> CQWW rules are pretty specific "...The multiplier station cannot call
>> CQ."
>>
>>
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list