[CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format

Igor Sokolov ua9cdc at gmail.com
Wed Nov 9 11:29:08 PST 2011


IMHO the difference is in intent. One thing is to brake rules deliberately. 
Another - genuine mistake.

73, Igor UA9CDC

> and the rules say the multiplier station shall only work new 
> multipliers......................  What is the difference.  It is ok to 
> break one rule but not the other?
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
> J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>
>
> On 11/9/2011 7:06 AM, Igor Sokolov wrote:
>>> Sure, they might get a new multiplier responding to their CQ from time 
>>> to
>>> time, but isn't this better than them calling CQ and saying "sorry, 
>>> can't
>>> work you now, you're not a multiplier" to the rest of us?
>>>
>>> W5OV
>>
>> CQWW rules are pretty specific  "...The multiplier station cannot call 
>> CQ."
>>
>>
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC 



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list