[CQ-Contest] unIDs

[PaulKB8N at aol.com]

>From K5AF 
 
FYI, here is what I posted in my 3830 writeup, FWIW. I posted this before I 
 realized there was  a thread started on CQ-Contest.


"Same old irritant!  We need to make a rule that when running,  stations 
must
identify a minimum of every third QSO, or face being penalized.  I don't 
like
the thought of "contest police", but we certainly could flag  some of the
offenders and take a look at the recorded spectrum to verify who  the 
culprits
are.  I am sure that the dupe rates for everyone would go  down, scores 
would go
up, and we wouldn't have as many "hornets nests" across  the spectrum.  
Overall,
it would make life much better for  everyone."
 
 
In a message dated 11/28/2011 1:16:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
w7why at frontier.com writes:

Hi  Ron

True, but if someone is sending '5nn23', I'd sure like to know who  it is. 
If they are sending '5nn13', I'd probably not be all that excited  and move 
on.  73
Tom W7WHY



Ron said:

"If you  don't know who they are, don't call them.
If, as a S&P station, you  don't want to wait for an ID, move on to work
someone  else."


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest