[CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?
N1MM
tfwagner at snet.net
Fri Oct 14 07:44:17 PDT 2011
On 10/14/2011 12:06 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
<snip>
A big amp in the shack is not PROOF of violation.
<snip>
But there is no reason a rule couldn't be drafted to outlaw amps capable
of much more than legal power being present during the contest or even
at any period of time prior to the contest. Proving that a large amp
is/was present is easier than showing that it is being used to produce
illegal power.
Contesting is a game, the rules can be anything the sponsor wants. If
such a rule would make catching cheaters easier, then a sponsor could
impose it.
Tom - N1MM
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list