[CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?

N1MM tfwagner at snet.net
Fri Oct 14 07:44:17 PDT 2011

On 10/14/2011 12:06 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
  A big amp in the shack is not PROOF of violation.

But there is no reason a rule couldn't be drafted to outlaw amps capable 
of much more than legal power being present during the contest or even 
at any period of time prior to the contest.  Proving that a large amp 
is/was present is easier than showing that it is being used to produce 
illegal power.

Contesting is a game, the rules can be anything the sponsor wants.  If 
such a rule would make catching cheaters easier, then a sponsor could 
impose it.

Tom - N1MM

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list