[CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site or copy and paste journalism

e73m at e73m.com e73m at e73m.com
Fri Sep 23 23:24:57 PDT 2011

I agree with Ed,

RDXC is good example for new contest.

BTW my posts are being rejected by list and I can not see why, if this 
one goes to trash by moderators then I get the message.

73 Danny

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:05:42 -0400, Edward Sawyer wrote:
> I agree with part of W5OV's statement.  If they agreed to secrecy, 
> they
> should be tied to it.  However, if the group does disband and get 
> re-built,
> it's the perfect time to change it to transparent.  Personally, I 
> believe it
> should be transparent.  This isn't the United Nations Security 
> Council
> folks.its contesting.
> If rules of a very popular contest are being proposed to be changed, 
> the
> voice of the ones enjoying it every year are pretty important voices 
> and
> deserve to be heard.
> By the way, let me be the first to vote NO on changes to the ARRL DX 
> contest
> as we know it and YES to starting up a new contest that is conceived 
> by the
> collective wisdom of this group.  One more series of DX contests 
> would have
> my vote.  And if it wants to be distance based, work everybody, only 
> be 24
> hours, (pick your favorite topic here), go for it.  I vote for April.
> 73
> Ed N1UR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list