[CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea

[Jeffrey Embry]

I rarely post here, chosing as one of the little pistols that plays
for FUN...but felt the need to on this topic.

I've been watching this thread for a while now, and have come to the
realization that this is a dupe of all the other cheating vs.
non-cheating arguments that crop up here on a regular basis.

My thoughts are pretty simple...the cheaters will cheat and those that
are honorable will not cheat.

Those that are HONORABLE are the WINNERS regardless of whether they
scored highest in the contest or not.

Seems simple enough to me.  There are many more real life issues to
worry about than there are contests.

73,

Jeff
K3OQ

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Jorge Diez - CX6VM
<cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com> wrote:
> All this seems is about finding how to do something that is not the spirit
> of the competition and looking for the approval of someone to do it.
>
> So you want to record your entire contest and give it to your secretary to
> correct your entire log?
>
> Or you want to participate in an event where you record the entire contest
> and the rules allow you one more week to listen to the audio files to
> correct the log?
>
> So I must assume you email every QSO in your log to verify that you are in
> his log and to be sure about the exchange he gave you? Because this is not
> in the rules, so you understand this is ethic?
>
> I am boring about cheaters and people that is looking for the small letter
> in the rules to cheat. That´s very bad for our hobby.
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] En nombre de Peter Voelpel
> Enviado el: Martes, 27 de Septiembre de 2011 09:51 p.m.
> Para: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Asunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE:
> Chea
>
> I don´t agree I don´t find the rule that tape logging is not allowed.
> Where do I find that rule about transcriptions?
> No rule prohibits tape logging.
> The logging was done during the contest.
>
> I am just thinking of the blind, who never could send in a log without
> transcription.
>
> 73
> Peter, DJ7WW
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of w5ov at w5ov.com
>
>> 2nd situation:
>>
>> Op A is tired before the contest and decides to tape record everything
> and write it down after the contest, rather than keep a computer log
> during the contest. No other person helped him with the tape recording
> or transcription functions before or after the contest. Is this allowed
> in the SO Unasisted category?
>
> Short answer: No.
>
> Explanation: This is a trick question because transcribing the contest
> after the contest is not allowed in any category. The logging must be done
> during the contest period - the contest ends at 23:59z.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Jeff Embry, K3OQ
FM19je
ARCI #11643, FPQRP #-696,
QRP-L # 67, NAQCC #25, ARS #1733
AMSAT LM-2263

--
Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss
of enthusiasm.  - Sir Winston Churchill