[CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP

[Eric Rosenberg]

Mark,

Thank you for your response.

As you know, I am quite passionate when it comes to this issue, and have
been both disappointed and dissatisfied with the results after years of
trying win over the NAQP contest managers to my and others point of view.

My hope is that regardless of your decision, which I hope will come in the
very near future, a full explanation will be given. This has not been the
case in the past, which has re-kindled the debate to an unnecessary degree.
Transparency is very important!

Should you have any questions rearding this issue, please feel free to
contact me directly.

73,
Eric W3DQ
Washington, DC

-------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: K6UFO Mark Aaker <k6ufo at arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP
To: "cq-contest at contesting.com" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Cc: Eric Rosenberg <ericrosenberg.dc at gmail.com>,  "kenlow7 at aol.com" <
kenlow7 at aol.com>

Ken and Eric and all, The NAQP Contest Managers have heard the
request to add DC as a Multiplier, and are reading the discussion.
As in previous years, we will consider it as a possible rule change
for next year's rules. In the meantime, the NAQP-SSB contest is
this weekend - see you on the air!

Mark Aaker K6UFO
NAQP RTTY Contest Manager
k6ufo at arrl.net