[CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0

Larry lknain at nc.rr.com
Sat Dec 15 12:18:28 EST 2012


The FCC required it prior to 1979. It was required by some contests up 
through the early 1980's and I seem to recall there was one that required it 
as late as the early 1990's. Which contests had the requirement has faded 
from my memory. I was thinking CQWW and SS had the requirement but I could 
be wrong.

73, Larry  W6NWS

-----Original Message----- 
From: Steve London
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:06 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0

If there ever was a CQWW rule that required signing /0, it predates my
move to Colorado in 1981.

I'm sure there is ---some--- contest out of the 250+ contests that
requires signing /0, but none of the major contests impose that requirement.

73,
Steve, N2IC (/5)

On 12/14/2012 08:04 AM, William Hein wrote:
> When I first lived in Colorado, in the '90s, I had the call AA6TT.  As a
> rule I did not sign "AA6TT/0" since this was my permanent station 
> location,
> I wasn't portable.  In CQ WW contests however I did sign /0 as I recall 
> the
> rules required me to do so.
>
> I'm now back living and hamming in Colorado with a non-zero call AA7XT
> (long story).  I checked CQ WW rules today to see if would have to sign /0
> in that contest and I didn't see any rules concerning portable calls.  Did
> CQ drop this rule?
>
> Are there any contests that will require me to sign /0?
>
> 73
> Bill AA7XT
> Glade Park CO
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list