[CQ-Contest] A smoking gun? (was RE: KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012)

[Dan Violette]

Note that the ARRL rule about operating within your privileges covers single
and multi-op (multi is where we wanted to train new contesters).  Couldn't
even change log to MO since broke the rules anyway.  I don't agree it was
multi-op with a control op present, but even multi is against the ARRL rules
when outside your operator privileges.  Dan KI6X

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dick Green WC1M
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:12 PM
To: w1md at cfl.rr.com; Dick Green WC1M; CONTEST
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A smoking gun? (was RE: KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL
CW 2012)

--edited--
 And if the host was present, then ARRL's logic in the KP2MM case would say
that the operation is Multi-Op. But I know of no case where this rule has
actually been enforced. 

73, Dick WC1M