[CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules

[Mladen Bogdanov]

Filipe, i can bet it would,my friend!
But i assume,if so,some of the people wouldn't be so persistent qualifying for the event!
 
Plus...it leaves no room for further speculation ....who are using second op.,skimmer,pclx...or any kind of assistance?!!
 
Just thinking out loud :)
 
73,Mladen YT6W
 
 
 
 

________________________________
 From: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt at gmail.com>
To: Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov at yahoo.com> 
Cc: Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff at dnainternet.net>; "cq-contest at contesting.com" <cq-contest at contesting.com> 
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules
  

Mladen, good point, that would be a very interesting competition :)))

Filipe CT1ILT - CR6K




2012/5/21 Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov at yahoo.com>

Therefore, WRTC should be Single Op. event (WRSOC).
>Put your SO1,2,3 or 4R setup and show your skills!
>Simple as that....
> 
>So one must brew coffee for himself :)
> 
>73, Mladen YT6W
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff at dnainternet.net>
>To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 9:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules
>
>
>>A single individual can have a lot more effect in a M/S operation than in a
>M/M operation. And a M/2 with two operators is a lot more like a single op
>effort than a M/2 with six operators. 
>
>
>If you brew coffee for team, you get same points (in all multi classes) ...
>
>73 Timo OH1NOA
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


-- 
Regards/Cumprimentos,
Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K
http://www.rep.pt/ct1ilt