[CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing
David Gilbert
xdavid at cis-broadband.com
Thu Nov 29 21:21:17 EST 2012
Another silly and exaggerated extrapolation, Paul.
Besides, about half of those things you quote ARE good for ham radio! ;)
Dave AB7E
On 11/29/2012 6:41 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
> On 30/11/2012 03:49, ko7ss at yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Again, if it (Skimmer) attracts more contestants, and generates
> > more QSO's, it must be good for ALL of us.
>
> Absolutely! And the following are good for ALL
> of us - for the same reasons.
>
> High power.
> Extra-Class licences on demand.
> Integration with Facebook and Skype.
> More data modes.
> No-exam ham licences for CBers.
> Remote receivers and transmitters.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list