[CQ-Contest] I loved the WPX - missing 10 min MS rule

[Mats Strandberg]

Exactly, one does not exclude the other.  Even if we are 6 in favour and 1
against, I think new CQ WPX Director at least can consider this rule
"change", because M/S is a category that inspires a lot of participation. I
know of several M/S stations that either went SO or M2/MM simply because of
this change.

73 de RM2D @ RM5A


2013/4/5 Braco OE1EMS <oe1ems at emssolutions.at>

> With 10 min rule you still can use 4 OPs/stations on same band.....and mult
> station to work mults on other bands without limited band changes but in 10
> min rule!
>
> 73s
> Braco
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
> ur0mc
> Gesendet: Freitag, 05. April 2013 17:03
> An: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Betreff: Re: [CQ-Contest] I loved the WPX - missing 10 min MS rule
>
>
>  I am against the 10 min MS rule. At my station has four operators to work
> on one band and listen during TX.
> This   is  the  work a real team, as four of the operators to be locked
> transmission in one band. Our operators do not miss :) Make a RX during TX
> and comes happiness :)
>
>
> 73. Roman  (UR0MC) aka UW2M, EO5M, AB9OF :: UZ2M team
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>