[CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems

W0MU Mike Fatchett w0mu at w0mu.com
Tue Dec 3 11:47:06 EST 2013


Try this link...

http://ronandrachel.com/wp-content/gallery/blog-media/2011Sep01-Journal/Europe-US.png


Mike W0MU

On 12/3/2013 9:02 AM, David Levine wrote:
> If the map at
> http://ronandrachel.com/wp-content/gallery/blog-media/2011Sep01-Journal/Europe-US.pngis
> accurate, and I saw many others similar to it online, then I can see a
> marked difference in how EU vs US compares for point opportunities.
>
> David - K2DSL
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> How about zero points for W/VE – W/VE QSO’s and count US states and VE
>> provinces as multipliers. Also zero points for EU-EU QSO’s and count only
>> EU counties as multipliers. I mean really is a DL working a G really
>> working DX ? Isn’t all the EU stations working each other (mostly on the
>> low bands)  like domestic contest in the US anyway?  Too bad for all those
>> EU stations I gave up in frustration trying to work from PJ4A on 160 and 80
>> meters because they were happily working each other for one point QSO’s. I
>> probably would have been a multiplier for them...
>>
>> Jeff KU8E
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list