[CQ-Contest] Wideband signals in the CW bands

David Siddall hhamwv at gmail.com
Fri Dec 6 11:13:13 EST 2013


I haven't been following this, but wouldn't it make sense that if we are to
continue the subband by regulation tradition in the U.S., that we consider
subbands by transmit signal bandwidth rather than by mode?  Transmit
signals <250 kHz at bottom, then gradation like <500, <1K, <2K, <3K (each
step up includes narrower bandwidths from below)?  Dave K3ZJ


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com> wrote:

> Now is your chance to officially comment on the ARRL's proposal to allow
> data emissions of up to 2.8 kHz bandwidth in all of the HF CW bands.
>
> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017477458
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list