[CQ-Contest] Skimmer accuracy...
W0MU Mike Fatchett
w0mu at w0mu.com
Tue Feb 19 21:50:17 EST 2013
With the amount of qrm on the bands I am surprised just how accurate the
system is.
I can see K0 and K1 being easily confused by software. Interestingly I
believe that at least two station need to receive the same data before
hitting the RBN. I could be wrong but I thought there was some checking
going on. I am sure Pete can help us here.
Mike W0MU
On 2/19/2013 7:05 PM, Bernie McClenny wrote:
> One of these was K0ZR. He was on 14046 around 20Z on the 17th.
> Not sure about the others.
>
>
> Bernie
>
>
> Bernie McClenny, W3UR
>
> The Daily DX, The Weekly DX
> With subscribers in all 50 states and more than 80 DXCC countries
> throughout the world.
> http://www.dailydx.com/trial.htm
> https://twitter.com/#!/dailydx
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Shane Mattson-->K1ZR
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:06 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer accuracy...
>
> I'm starting a new thread for increased visibility to this issue.
>
>
>
> This is by no means a skimmer bashing post, so please don't go there..
>
>
>
> I'm just curious if others have observed the following:
>
>
>
> Just for kicks I performed a RBN spot search for my call and the
> following spots came up during a period of time that I was QRT. I did
> not operate at all on Sunday.
>
>
>
> de dx freq cq/dx snr speed time
>
> K3LR K1ZR 28005.3 CW CQ 13 dB 32 wpm 2042z 17 Feb
>
> K3LR K1ZR 14046.6 CW CQ 24 dB 31 wpm 2014z 17 Feb
>
> KM3T K1ZR 14046.6 CW CQ 15 dB 33 wpm 2011z 17 Feb
>
> VE2WU K1ZR 14046.6 CW CQ 20 dB 31 wpm 1927z 17 Feb
>
> K8ND K1ZR 21006.9 CW CQ 8 dB 32 wpm 1743z 17 Feb
>
> NY3A K1ZR 28062.4 CW CQ 28 dB 31 wpm 1654z 17 Feb
>
> K2DB K1ZR 7020.5 CW CQ 10 dB 29 wpm 0855z 17 Feb
>
> K2DB K1ZR 7020.4 CW CQ 11 dB 30 wpm 0753z 17 Feb
>
> K3LR K1ZR 3510.3 CW CQ 26 dB 29 wpm 0207z 17 Feb
>
>
>
> Perhaps the skimmers misinterpreted a like-call sign? I'm not excited
> about seeing my call detected and spotted during a period for which I
> was QRT. An issue like this emphasizes the importance of double
> checking the call sign for accuracy before logging a point and shoot
> qso.
>
>
>
> Could someone within the RBN domain provide some insight as to how to
> address an issue like this?
>
>
>
> -Shane
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list